Welcome to the Club Penguin Wiki! Log in or Create an account to join the community!
Club Penguin Wiki talk:Council
Council
Look, this is just dumb. If we're going to regularly doing this kind of thing (we'll see after this trial) then we simply need to convert to the IRC meetings formula. Everybody should be allowed to attend, there are no leaders or admin distinction: we just put in a list of topics and discuss and vote on them at the end of it. Let's see how this turns out though. --Tigernose Talk • Contribs 16:32, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- And we don't need a new channel... just use our current one and mute it so everyone participating has voice. --Tigernose
Talk • Contribs 16:33, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Club_Penguin Wiki:Policy Making Council Proposal#Vote .28.2B13.29. TN, you're the only one who doesn't agree. I don't see anything wrong with it. If we made it on the main channel, it may turn into a total mess, with people talking nonsense and such. --PenblooeR © 2011 20:23, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- Ditto PenblooeR. --LordMaster96 00:02, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
I think we should have a different channel for the meetings- that way people who aren't on the council can still chat as usual. I don't see the point of the "council" in the first place... I agree with TN.
- I don't see a point in a "policy-council" only. I see a point in a "council" in general, which I'm hoping to change it into sooner or later. --LordMaster96 02:52, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Partnership with JaysnakeTV
Hey CPW, this if HF from the Fanon wiki. I've recently negotiated a partnership with JaysnakeTV, a Club Penguin YouTuber with about 600 subscribers. The partnership is simple: we advertise him on the main page, and he advertises us with videos. We're planning to create more deals like this, and we'd like to know if CPW wants some of the loving? ----Happyface414 (talk|blog|contribs) 04:37, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
- I/We have allowed the Portuguese CPW to have a partnership system almost a year ago, and it looks like it's running fine there. To me I don't see a problem with it here either. This is actually something we can probably discuss about at the next meeting. Thanks for bringing it up. --
Error504 05:13, 12 June 2012 (UTC)