Welcome to the Club Penguin Wiki! Log in or Create an account to join the community!
Club Penguin Wiki:Archive/Demotions (of inactive users)
I am going to start something that should've been done. The demotion of users no longer active or editing. That way, it may open up some space for newer users. If you disagree, just let me know on this forum.
Thanks, and have a great day.
Okay, I've done good so far in this project. If another bureaucrat agrees, can I have some assistance with this? It's a lot to do by myself.
Thank you all for your support, and have a wonderful day!
Comments?
- I agree 100% --seahorseruler |Talk (EditCount) Yoshi! 20:42, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- Me too. This should have been done a lot sooner; I mean, people are always complaining that there are too many blah, blah, blah... ~falls asleep~ See what I mean? I'm totally with this. American Che AHH! WHAT A STUPID KABOB! Your spelling is FIAL! 20:57, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- I agree cause this will make user happier!Shoop Da Whoop! I'm Firin' Mah Laza! 21:58, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- Exactly! I mean, (and i'm not saying it will happen but if it did...) what would happen if we had about 20 adimins or rollbacks? Inactive ones have to be demoted.--EuropeaTalk to me 22:50, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- I agree... we need some new fish round here.
- Hat Pop, remember our discussion at IRC about this. I said we should give them this message: Rollback powers should only be given to users who regulary prevent vandalism. Rollbacks have 2 weeks to prove themselves, and if they prevent at least 10 pieces of vandalism, participate in a non-vandalism project, or do something significant about vandalism, they keep their powers. Rollbacking isn't another step towards sysop powers. It is simply an ability to have an extra button which can remove vandalism with ease. It is not a ranking of any sort.
Also, sysop powers should only be given to users who regularly edit, participate in user projects and move the wiki forward in any way possible. It should not be given to users who have 1000 edits, with 900 of them being talk edits. It should be given to users who help an article become featured, make more pages, help the wiki get a spotlight or help the wikia have 1000 articles for example. These are all good examples of things that should be noted when making a user an admin. Yet again, sysopship is not a rank or a step towards being a beauracrat, it is the chance of getting extra abilities to help the wiki become better. The wiki is for visitors, remember, not the users. Take this in, and note this when doing stuff like "promoting". --TЙГЭPHO3Ь
(Chat|Edits|Vandals) 13:02, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
- Agree.Template:Hasign
- No doubt. I'll do it too! --$harkbate DON'T MESS WITH THA SHARK BOI! 13:38, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
- We came to conclusion ages ago that demoting inactive sysops would only annoy them if they ever came back and that it only helps us stastically, which in reality doesn't help us at all. Also, it's pretty disrespectful. The old user's of this wiki's legacy should stay.
