Club Penguin Wiki talk:Penguin of the Month/Archive 1

The POTM is ending on May 29, 2011.

Sequence of events

1. LordMaster96 wants the system of the Penguin of the Month changed up due to the fact that users who don't really have a good reason are getting nominated.
2. Seahorseruler wants to get rid of it completely
3. LordMaster96 agrees with Seahorseruler.
4. ClubPenguinMaster agrees - by this point a majority in administration has been reached
5. Bacon777 agrees
6. NickelbackFan37 agrees.

--LordMaster96<staff /> 03:36, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

How about admins nominate them or something? --The Chill Master! Talk to me I am the party dragon! Master of the pencil Calling all agents! Let's-a read! Awesomeness here Wrong turn! 20:34, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

I agree with chill, because then there won't be the same people nominated, like LM said. Cp kid Let's talk! 20:36, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Just about every body has been nominated at some point. I can't speak for the admins, but I don't think they're gonna reverse their decision. Bacon777 Chat to me! 21:27, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

I can't see why we need to get rid of this!! Everyone who has won has one for a good reason! Why can't we just have the administrators nominate? What's wrong with that? I understand that users without a good reason are being nominated, but the fate if the PoTM shouldn't rest on the fact that people who do not have a good reason get nominated, it should rest on the fact that the people who don't have a good reason don't win! Sure, people get nominated without a good reason, but do they win? No, because there is someone with a GOOD reason who always beats them! You can nominate all these people without a good reason, but see if they win! And I am sure that I can trust the administrators to nominate people with a good reason!--THE RULER AND DICTATOR OF AWESOME HAS ARRIVED _{TALK TO HIM, OR ELSE...} YOU WILL BE FORCED TO SEE HIS TEMPLATES! 21:34, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Like I said before, the ADMINS most likely WON'T reverse their decision. And 3/5 admins agreed to get rid of it. They are getting rid of it. Gezz. Bacon777 Chat to me! 21:45, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Maybe us users could make our own PoTMs. --The Chill Master! Talk to me I am the party dragon! Master of the pencil Calling all agents! Let's-a read! Awesomeness here Wrong turn! 21:53, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Bacon, I will remind you once again: Remember what happened to the No wiki-games policy! They were going to delete all of our missions, but did they? No, because we opposed it a lot! For example, in Egypt, when they got rid of Mubarak! If you protest enough, you get your way!--THE RULER AND DICTATOR OF AWESOME HAS ARRIVED _{TALK TO HIM, OR ELSE...} YOU WILL BE FORCED TO SEE HIS TEMPLATES! 22:14, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

3 admins plus 2 other users (including ME) agreed. All protesting does is cause a big fight and screw up the wiki. If that happens, blocks WILL be handed out. I assure you. Please, don't try to protest. If the admins say it's gone, it's gone. No doubt. Geez, just stop. OK? Bacon777 Chat to me! 22:19, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Instead of removing the system ENTIRELY, why not just make it so admins can only nominate people?

1. I agree with CK, Cooldude and Chill. 2. I will remind you of the No Item Articles Policy a couple years ago. NOW look where we are!--THE RULER AND DICTATOR OF AWESOME HAS ARRIVED _{TALK TO HIM, OR ELSE...} YOU WILL BE FORCED TO SEE HIS TEMPLATES! 22:21, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

And still, why do only the ADMINS get a say? Can't we have a proper VOTE about this? The wiki is not a place where the admins just decide stuff, like "You must do this, you must do that!" The wiki is a place to compromise! And anyway Bacon, you SHOULD be blocked, so your vote would not count anyway!--THE RULER AND DICTATOR OF AWESOME HAS ARRIVED _{TALK TO HIM, OR ELSE...} YOU WILL BE FORCED TO SEE HIS TEMPLATES! 22:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)