Welcome to the Club Penguin Wiki! Log in or Create an account to join the community!

Club Penguin Wiki:Archive/New WoF System

From the Club Penguin Wiki, the free, editable encyclopedia about Club Penguin
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hello, this is Tigernose. You might know Alx's succeeded forum to close down WoF requests. I also have another idea regarding the WoF. If this does go through, it will only occur after the requests open up or something. This is what I am proposing:

  1. The WoF will have a different election system. Before it was TS or a webmaster choosing someone. He mostly chose who he thought of as friends or "genius'". Subsequently, there are people who remain on this list, who some people do not think are worthy. These are usually people who have quit. I propose after a community vote, that some of these users should be removed. The WoF of fame should be lightened up a bit, because with the way things are going, eventually everyone is going to be put on there one time or the other. So yes my first idea is to remove those who are unworthy to be on there via community vote.
  2. Yes, the requests have closed but I have an even better idea. You have to be nominated by someone else to be put up there. This way, you can't just nominate yourself, nor can a "dictator" put you on immediately.
  3. After being nominated, the nominator will then make a new section on the talk page with a section vote. Two simple sections: For & Against. People may put comments underneath the "comments" section. This ensures a democratic community vote: make a vote open to everyone.

Okay thanks, now I will make votes addressing each of these issues here. --Թայգէրնոս (Chat|Edits|Vandals) 12:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Removing users

See here for more details regarding removing users. This vote is regarding the removal of users. We will then have a community vote (if this goes through) regarding who should be removed. I mean there are some really clever, funny and friendly users up there, but some of them haven't physically helped the wiki. The WoGF would be better for them.

For

--Ced1214 Talk Page 12:58, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

--Pingali Moi Ca Plane Pour Moi 11:22, September 12, 2009 (UTC)

Against

Discussion

Nomination system

Simple, this vote is regarding my idea of being nominated by other people. It does not regard the other ideas. (e.g. This may go through but number 3 may not. Therefore you must be nominated by someone else but the way of agreeing if they should go up here goes on as normal).

For

--Ced1214 Talk Page 12:58, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Against

Discussion

Election system

Okay this is regarding the idea of having a community vote to decide whether a nominated user should go up on the wall.

For

--Ced1214 Talk Page 12:58, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Against

Discussion

  • Yeah, I think if everyone had a say, the results of elections would be more realistic. Քյոոթլոլւ File:CP Ninja.JPEG !NINJA! 12:23, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Section votes are more secure. You can vote on polls multiple times, which would be cheating. --seahorseruler |Talk (EditCount) Yoshi! 16:05, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Yeah I know, I just thought a poll would be a bit more user friendly, but I would rather have a secure section vote. I will change that now. --Թայգէրնոս (Chat|Edits|Vandals) 22:02, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Ummmm can you plz say that in a shorter sentence? Lol. Unknown4 Talk 22:15, 27 August 2009 (UTC)