Club Penguin Wiki:Archive/Remove patroller right

There are only a few patrollers, and I noticed the right is kind of not needed because vandalism/spam rates are very low, so the current admins can handle deletions. Plus, it may confuse newer users, if they see someone deleting something, they may instantly assume it is an administrator (and therefor think they have the final say/decision on something's deletion). Current users will patroller will be migrated to simply the rollback group if this passes. Also, if you are a patroller, don't vote no because you don't want to loose your rights, this is in no way related to something you did, its just I feel the right is not needed, and rollback would be more suitable. Thanks. --Seahorseruler <staff /> ^{(Talk Page) (Contribs)} 02:10, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Vote (+11)

For (14)

1. Read above. ----Seahorseruler <staff /> ^{(Talk Page) (Contribs)} 02:10, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
2. --Hat Pop ^{Bunny Ears Rule!} 02:33, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
3. -- LordMaster96 03:47, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
4. --NickelbackFan37 _加拿大 ^香港 July 1-exclusive sig! 03:54, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
5. --Nando144 Talk with me! 08:27, 5 July 2011 (Brasilia Time)
6. ShrimpPin ( Talk ) Go Purple Pups! 12:48, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
7. --PenblooeR © 2011 Talk to me! Or else... 17:11, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
8. --ClubPenguinMaster • Talk 17:22, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
9. It was a pointless right in the first place. It's the reason why we had that recent TurtleShroom crisis, and overall it's just dumb. --Tigernose Talk • Contribs 18:15, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
10. I happened to introduce it upon Seahorse's request some time ago (when the wiki moved to 000webhost originally). I agree with removal. Andrew (The devil is down in Georgia) ^{(Product of human clones)} 20:01, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
11. --THE RULER AND DICTATOR OF AWESOME HAS ARRIVED _{TALK TO HIM, OR ELSE...} YOU WILL BE FORCED TO SEE HIS TEMPLATES! 20:10, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
12. -- Talk to tha donut dood! 01:26, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
13. --Ben 100022 03:33, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
14. I agree fully. --Sharkbate 14:33, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Against (3)

1. --Brookelas Happy 4th of July Happy Canada Day too! My question: Why? Admins are not ALWAYS on you know...
2. Per Brook. --Chill, Fireworks Master It's 4th of July! BOOM! Fireworks Oh, Happy Canada Day too! 16:58, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
3. Cooldude254 18:09, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments

• I'll have to agree with Sea. I think at the moment five admins would be enough to deal with any type of spam or vandalism, and we could, for now, give the patrollers the rollback right. Until the wiki gets more traffic, I think it's best to get rid of this. -- LordMaster96 03:47, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
• I think the Admins can handle it alone... ShrimpPin ( Talk ) Go Purple Pups! 12:48, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
• Not much vandalism here. Plus, the only major difference is that patrollers can delete pages which the administration usually does more than the current patrollers. --ClubPenguinMaster • Talk 17:22, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Also to Brook: Patrollers are not ALWAYS online either.

• I don't get it: Why are we removing them? They have been very nice, I know vandalism level is extremely low, but what if a vandal comes? They are also very helpful on the wiki, so I vote no. Cooldude254 18:09, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Since the vandalism is low, when vandals come, the admins can take care of it. --ClubPenguinMaster • Talk 18:17, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

You have a point. -- Talk to tha donut dood! 01:26, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Hmph, "because they are nice" isn't a valid reason to say no. --Ben 100022 03:32, 6 July 2011 (UTC)