Welcome to the Club Penguin Wiki! Log in or Create an account to join the community!

Club Penguin Wiki talk:Party Ratings/2016/Operation: Tri-umph/card

From the Club Penguin Wiki, the free, editable encyclopedia about Club Penguin
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I'm definitely doing a review on this. So far, it's the laziest thing I've ever seen Club Penguin do. In fact, one of the laziest things IN GENERAL.

--Mr Cow2 (talk) 22:31, 20 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

If you'd like to leave a review, please do it on the actual review page. Thanks. :) --Hat Pop Bunny Ears Rule! 23:50, 20 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
I will eventually, but it's currently running. However, my review WILL be negative. I can tell you that already. --Mr Cow2 (talk) 01:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
Still better than the-party-that-shall-not-be-named. {{SUBST:Starsiggy}} 06:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Actually, no. This is WORSE. At least the random UFO abductions were fun, even thought they were more fun than the party itself. It also gave us a cool tin foil hat. Absolutely NOTHING good comes out of this party. If this party keeps going in the direction it's going in, this next review will be my WORST ONE YET. And yet, I know that no matter what, it can ALWAYS get worse. --Mr Cow2 (talk) 19:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
I disagree (mainly because the UFO thing never happened for me). I mean, at least the items available are sorta nice and there's a lot of them, while ET party just had a spacesuit, a hat, and four recolored backgrounds and ran for four months for no reason. {{SUBST:Starsiggy}} 09:09, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
The items are sort of nice until you realize that ABOSLUTELY NO EFFORT WAS USED TO COME UP WITH THEM. Seriously, a 5 year old could probably come up with these items. I do agree with you on the backgrounds and the overly long party time, though. Personally, I could not at all tell the difference between the backgrounds. --Mr Cow2 (talk) 15:12, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply