Welcome to the Club Penguin Wiki! Log in or Create an account to join the community!
Club Penguin Wiki talk:January 2015 Council Topics
Latest comment: 22 April 2015 by Refractor in topic acting on the votes
All these "Videos" sections in articles are annoying me, solely because they are pure embeds of Youtube videos which is unprofessional for a wiki. Why not make them like Wikia with a thumbnail style?
04:15, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- It would also be interesting to replace the old <object> youtube embed with the new <iframe> one. --Juca (discussão/talk)
23:10, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- Fixed. Should use HTML5 now. --Refractor (talk) 01:25, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, that's awesome :) --Juca (discussão/talk) 01:40, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, that's awesome :) --Juca (discussão/talk)
- Fixed. Should use HTML5 now. --Refractor (talk) 01:25, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
acting on the votes
So the CPWN WoF and mobile theme passed, with the RSnail namespace being tied. The latter might need to have a tiebreaker of some sort. When we will start planning these? --Refractor (talk) 12:42, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- RSnail namespace probably won't be implemented since it lacks admin support. As for the other two, I guess we could start at any point now given that the resources are available. --LordMaster96 02:07, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- I recommend the mobile theme to be similar to Wikipedia's. There would be a menu button at the top (universally indicated with the 3 lines) with a search box aside it. When the menu button would be clicked, all the necessary links for mobile would show up from the side of the screen. Infoboxes would take up the whole width of the page. Then the lead paragraph. Then the sections. All the sections would have an edit button aligned to the right. And finally there would be the footer at the bottom (Privacy Policy, About, Terms of Use, CC etc.). This is just a suggestion. 07:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- I still think we should do it the right way - a responsive skin. I think this is ultimately the direction Wikipedia wants to go in, so it'll be in base MW. Until then, we'll have to pick a custom one or possibly even write one ourselves. --Refractor (talk) 14:44, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- I think MobileFrontend is a better option than responsive skins. Mobile themes have a better experience most times. --Juca (discussão/talk) 15:23, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- I think MobileFrontend is a better option than responsive skins. Mobile themes have a better experience most times. --Juca (discussão/talk)
- I still think we should do it the right way - a responsive skin. I think this is ultimately the direction Wikipedia wants to go in, so it'll be in base MW. Until then, we'll have to pick a custom one or possibly even write one ourselves. --Refractor (talk) 14:44, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- I recommend the mobile theme to be similar to Wikipedia's. There would be a menu button at the top (universally indicated with the 3 lines) with a search box aside it. When the menu button would be clicked, all the necessary links for mobile would show up from the side of the screen. Infoboxes would take up the whole width of the page. Then the lead paragraph. Then the sections. All the sections would have an edit button aligned to the right. And finally there would be the footer at the bottom (Privacy Policy, About, Terms of Use, CC etc.). This is just a suggestion. 07:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- MobileFrontend has been dealt with. --Refractor (talk) 01:27, 22 April 2015 (UTC)